Through
Digg I found
an article by
Forrest M. Mims III describing a talk by
Dr. Eric Pianka advocating the need for the human population to be reduced to 10% of its current level, most efficiently via airborne ebola. I can only applaud Mr. Mims for reporting on this speech which was intentionally not videotaped during the 109th meeting of the Texas Academy of Science and walking out on Dr. Pianka's award of 2006 Distinguished Texas Scientist.
While I agree that human overpopulation

is a problem for humans and the rest of the Earth's ecosystem, Dr. Pianka's proposed solution of genocide is both ridiculous and unethical. Never mind that Dr. Pianka's chosen method for killing 90% of humans is unlikely to work. Dr. Pianka's horrific solution would be most likely to kill the most active and gregarious people first, not improving the average level of intelligence that he apparently bemoans. If 90% of the human population were killed in a short period of time, not only would human civilization be devastated, the sheer biomass of rotting corpses would have a negative impact on other lifeforms. We have enough threats to be concerned about, asteroids, diseases, nuclear holocaust, etc., without intentionally poisoning ourselves. If humans as a whole realize that we need to control their population, there are very humane, effective ways to address the problem.
It may be that Mr. Mims' description of the talk was skewed or incorrect. Perhaps
Dr. Pianka was trying to use humor or hyperbole to draw attention to the plight of the Earth's ecosystem.
A course description by Dr. Pianka mentions many of the points brought forward by Mr. Mims, but simply argues that at our current rate of population growth, humans will kill themselves by destroying the ecosystem, not that we should take immediate steps to reduce the human population by 90%. Because the actual proceedings were not recorded, we must rely on Mr. Mims' report. Unfortunately, Dr. Pianka's remarks could cast an even greater pall over the already embattled field of evolutionary studies. Having an apparently respected member of the scientific community continue to espouse such hateful views without response from the general scientific community may damage the credibility of the scientific community as a whole. Worst of all, Dr. Pianka's remarks are likely to hurt his apparent goal of improving the state of the planet because it is alienating rather than inclusive.
Technorati Tags:
Pianka Mims ebola ecology science technology holocaust genocide extinction
Sphere: Related Content